A moment will come when an aquarium enthusiast will want to diversify the animal fauna in their tank to include species outside of fish. Freshwater aquarium shrimp are good choices in this regard. They add wonderful diversity to an aquarium and also serve as efficient cleaners by eating algae and scavenging leftover food from the substrate. Most species of shrimp suitable for home aquariums will range in size from ½-inch to 3-inches when fully grown.
Introducing shrimp into an established aquarium requires a basic process to be followed in order to avoid acclimation problems for the shrimp themselves as well as the existing fish and plants currently present in your aquarium. Always take into consideration the fish species that inhabit your tank. Guppies, tetras and killifish are the most compatible with shrimp, but a good rule of thumb is to only keep shrimp with fish whose mouths are less than one-half in size in relation to the body of the fully grown shrimp. If upon introducing shrimp into your tank you notice strong aggression coming from a particular fish, monitor the situation closely. If the aggression does not stop the shrimp will have to be relocated.
Another part of the process for introducing freshwater aquarium shrimp is determining the number of shrimp to have in a tank. Shrimp are by nature territorial. If you have too many shrimp in an aquarium it can create aggression between the shrimp. In aquariums with a ten-gallon capacity and higher you could have one smaller species of shrimp per one gallon of water. Small species are those one-inch or smaller when fully grown. With larger species you should allocate as much as three gallons per shrimp to avoid territorial aggressiveness.
Having a suitable environment present in the aquarium prior to introducing the shrimp is also important. To achieve this, make certain that your aquarium set up includes stem plants from which shrimp can cling from. Also, have low lying foliage available to provide the shrimp with places to hide.
What do I feed my shrimp?
Freshwater aquarium shrimp are omnivores, meaning that they will eat plant and animal tissue. The most common species sold for aquariums are plant friendly. These shrimp will eat algae growth from the sides of the tank and will scavenge for food that has fallen on the substrate. If you notice that your shrimp start nibbling at your live plants simply add a little more food flakes than usual when feeding your fish. This will allow more of the flakes to fall to where the shrimp can consume them. If this were to be necessary, however, do it in small gradual increments. You do not want to end up with overfed fish or more food than even your shrimp can eat on the substrate, resulting in water contamination.
Caring for the shrimp
Shrimp are quite self-sufficient in a well-balanced aquarium. Their care is primarily centered on what to avoid, as opposed to an active regimen. Never use any sort of water additive, fish medicine, or any other supplement of any kind which contains copper. Copper is deadly to shrimp. In the wild, shrimp reproduce rapidly. In a multi-species aquarium, however, you will not have the problem of a population explosion in that most shrimp larvae will be eaten by the fish inhabitants and will never reach maturity. In terms of water condition, the same weekly monitoring that you perform for the aquarium overall will also cover the needs of the shrimp as they are equally sensitive to rises in ammonia, nitrites and nitrates, just as fish. If anything, you may even detect lowered levels of these compounds due to their own scavenging and algae eating efforts.
As long as one adheres to this basic process in selecting, feeding and caring for freshwater aquarium shrimp, they will make a practical and beautiful addition to your aquarium.
Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/pets-articles/adding-some-diversity-to-your-tank-with-freshwater-aquarium-shrimp-4045824.html
Showing posts with label nature. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nature. Show all posts
Wednesday, February 9, 2011
Friday, July 25, 2008
Offshore drilling can harmoniously exist with nature — and does so
I believe the Asheville Citizen-Times’ editorial, “Expanded offshore drilling is no answer to our energy crisis” (AC-T, July 16), is in desperate need of a response.
It’s one thing to take a position on an issue, but it’s quite another to use as the foundation for your arguments fears that have little basis in reality, and the editorial to which I refer has a few of them.
First and foremost is the assumption that because the North Carolina coast is indeed in “Hurricane Alley” that any drilling rigs off the Carolina coast would be in danger, thus they would pose an immediate threat to the coast of Carolina. Oil companies pay engineers a lot of money to design those rigs to withstand all that Mother Nature can dish out. While they’re not completely foolproof, the rigs do have an outstanding safety record considering what they have to endure.
Rigs withstand storms
In 2005, Hurricanes Katrina and Rita ripped through the Gulf of Mexico. At least two dozen active rigs were damaged to some degree, but little oil was lost. A Houston Chronicle article dated Nov. 13, 2005 (“Spills from hurricanes staining the coast”), details the environmental disasters of the those two hurricanes, but a close examination of the article shows that the vast majority of the spills came from damaged storage tanks, not off-shore rigs. In fact, what oil leaked from the rigs is described in the article this way, “The spills are so thin and evaporate so easily that they likely disappeared before anyone could reach them.” In other words, they were of little consequence.
The solution obviously would be that if drilling is to take place of the coast of Carolina, then the storage of whatever crude is produced should be handled somewhere else.
Not really pristine
The second fear — that somehow having oil rigs off the Carolina coast automatically means an end to pristine beaches — is pure hogwash as well. I grew up along the Gulf Coast of Mississippi (which shares the same Gulf waters as rigs off the coast of Louisiana), and never once did I ever see an oil slick at the beach, and the beach was never closed due to any oil-related matter that I can remember. I just returned from a visit to Sunset Beach along the Carolina coast, and it is indeed beautiful, but I wouldn’t call it pristine.
Every day, I found myself picking discarded lures, floats, parts of fishing nets, plastics, Styrofoam and who knows what else off the sand and out of the surf. Should we ban the fishing and shrimping industries too? How about tourists? Certainly, they’re polluting as much, if not more, than the folks who make their living out in the water.
The final fear stated in the AC-T editorial is the fear that the rigs will somehow interrupt or ruin the fishing industry in Carolina and, somehow, bird habitats (that one’s a real stretch). The U.S. has had active rigs in the Gulf of Mexico for decades, and I can personally attest to the fine fishing and abundant seafood to be found there. I have a freezer full of it thanks to a recent trip to my parents’ house in Mississippi.
Abundant marine life
Fishermen along the Gulf have long known that fish love to hang around the artificial reefs represented by the rigs — reefs teeming with marine life that usually mean great fishing. Ask any charter captain along the Gulf Coast of Louisiana or Mississippi where the good fishing is, and he’ll tell you, he’s headed out to the rigs. I’ve been fishing out in the Gulf, and the water is crystal-clear south of the barrier islands off the coast of Mississippi. My point is oil rigs off the coast of Carolina might actually enhance, not ruin, Carolina’s fishing industry.
Perhaps I should invite my colleagues on the editorial staff down to the Gulf on a fact-finding mission. I’m sure it won’t change their minds about drilling off the Carolina coast, but at least they’ll know that offshore drilling can harmoniously exist with nature, and we can eat some great seafood while we’re down there.
Doug Mayer is a multimedia specialist for the Asheville Citizen-Times. He lives in Fletcher.
It’s one thing to take a position on an issue, but it’s quite another to use as the foundation for your arguments fears that have little basis in reality, and the editorial to which I refer has a few of them.
First and foremost is the assumption that because the North Carolina coast is indeed in “Hurricane Alley” that any drilling rigs off the Carolina coast would be in danger, thus they would pose an immediate threat to the coast of Carolina. Oil companies pay engineers a lot of money to design those rigs to withstand all that Mother Nature can dish out. While they’re not completely foolproof, the rigs do have an outstanding safety record considering what they have to endure.
Rigs withstand storms
In 2005, Hurricanes Katrina and Rita ripped through the Gulf of Mexico. At least two dozen active rigs were damaged to some degree, but little oil was lost. A Houston Chronicle article dated Nov. 13, 2005 (“Spills from hurricanes staining the coast”), details the environmental disasters of the those two hurricanes, but a close examination of the article shows that the vast majority of the spills came from damaged storage tanks, not off-shore rigs. In fact, what oil leaked from the rigs is described in the article this way, “The spills are so thin and evaporate so easily that they likely disappeared before anyone could reach them.” In other words, they were of little consequence.
The solution obviously would be that if drilling is to take place of the coast of Carolina, then the storage of whatever crude is produced should be handled somewhere else.
Not really pristine
The second fear — that somehow having oil rigs off the Carolina coast automatically means an end to pristine beaches — is pure hogwash as well. I grew up along the Gulf Coast of Mississippi (which shares the same Gulf waters as rigs off the coast of Louisiana), and never once did I ever see an oil slick at the beach, and the beach was never closed due to any oil-related matter that I can remember. I just returned from a visit to Sunset Beach along the Carolina coast, and it is indeed beautiful, but I wouldn’t call it pristine.
Every day, I found myself picking discarded lures, floats, parts of fishing nets, plastics, Styrofoam and who knows what else off the sand and out of the surf. Should we ban the fishing and shrimping industries too? How about tourists? Certainly, they’re polluting as much, if not more, than the folks who make their living out in the water.
The final fear stated in the AC-T editorial is the fear that the rigs will somehow interrupt or ruin the fishing industry in Carolina and, somehow, bird habitats (that one’s a real stretch). The U.S. has had active rigs in the Gulf of Mexico for decades, and I can personally attest to the fine fishing and abundant seafood to be found there. I have a freezer full of it thanks to a recent trip to my parents’ house in Mississippi.
Abundant marine life
Fishermen along the Gulf have long known that fish love to hang around the artificial reefs represented by the rigs — reefs teeming with marine life that usually mean great fishing. Ask any charter captain along the Gulf Coast of Louisiana or Mississippi where the good fishing is, and he’ll tell you, he’s headed out to the rigs. I’ve been fishing out in the Gulf, and the water is crystal-clear south of the barrier islands off the coast of Mississippi. My point is oil rigs off the coast of Carolina might actually enhance, not ruin, Carolina’s fishing industry.
Perhaps I should invite my colleagues on the editorial staff down to the Gulf on a fact-finding mission. I’m sure it won’t change their minds about drilling off the Carolina coast, but at least they’ll know that offshore drilling can harmoniously exist with nature, and we can eat some great seafood while we’re down there.
Doug Mayer is a multimedia specialist for the Asheville Citizen-Times. He lives in Fletcher.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)